![]() Stress-ng: info: (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time) Stress-ng: info: stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s Stress-ng: info: successful run completed in 60.00s (1 min, 0.00 secs) To benchmark, for example, matrix product for 60 seconds on 4 CPU threads, use: stress-ng -cpu 4 -cpu-method matrixprod -metrics-brief -perf -t 60 To see the cpu related stress methods use: stress-ng -cpu-method which Install using: sudo apt-get install stress-ng ![]() The cpu stress test contains many different CPU stress methods covering integer, floating point, bit operations, mixed compute, prime computation, and a wide range of computations. ![]() It has a CPU stress test as one of the many stress tests built into the tool. Sure, it takes a few seconds to apply filters, but the user interface and particularly the brushes respond instantly to inputs.Alternatively, one can use stress-ng. Even though an older device such as the Wacom Mobile Studio Pro 13 equipped with an Intel Core i7-6567U (two Skylake cores) trailed far behind newer systems with a score of 97, Affinity Photo 2 remained usable even when processing larger images. Both chips performed around 43 and 50 per cent better than the Core i7-12700H and Apple M2 respectively. Unsurprisingly, the Apple M1 Pro and M1 Max delivered around the same level of performance because they practically share the same CPU configuration. The Intel Core i7-12700H (14 cores) performed 13 per cent better than the Core i9-11900K (8 cores) – this is roughly the same margin you would expect to see in Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5. In any case, Affinity Photo 2 benefits from higher CPU core counts. That is to say, the results do not reflect any possible performance limitations caused by inadequate cooling under sustained load. ![]() Even the power-efficient Apple M1 in the iPad Pro managed to slightly outperform the desktop processor Intel Core i9-11900K, despite the fact that the Intel CPU is ahead of the M1 in benchmarks such as Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5 in terms of both single- and multi-core performance.Īt this point, we need to emphasise that each run of the benchmark in Affinity Photo 2 only lasts a few seconds. When it comes to processor performance, Affinity Photo 2 demonstrates a similarly high level of optimisation for Apple's platform. According to the developer, you can directly compare the results between different platforms and operating systems as long as the same version of the app is used.ĬPU benchmarks: Apple M1 beats Intel Core i9-11900K The results were obtained using the integrated benchmark tool in Affinity Photo 2, which tests both raster and vector performance. In the benchmark results below, we will show you which devices provide the best performance running these creative apps. Much like Designer 2 (Illustrator alternative) and Publisher 2 (InDesign alternative), Affinity Photo 2 is available on Windows as well as macOS and iPadOS. Instead of requiring a subscription, Serif Labs is asking for a one-off payment of €84.99 (US$69.99). The software doesn't just offer a similar range of features, but is also significantly less expensive than Photoshop. Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:Īffinity Photo 2 pitches itself as a complete alternative to Adobe Photoshop CC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |